Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

QwQ-32B

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

QwQ-32B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 3 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

2mo newer

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Gemini 2.5 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B (2024-11-28).

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

2 mo newer

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher AIME 2024 score (92.0% vs 79.5%)

Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 65.2%)

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Gemini 2.5 Pro

QwQ-32B

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 2.5 Pro	QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or QwQ-32B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro and QwQ-32B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Pro and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro and QwQ-32B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.