Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QwQ-32B-Preview is 21.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA), while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

QwQ-32B-Preview costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while QwQ-32B-Preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B-Preview does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 6 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while QwQ-32B-Preview has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Gemini 2.5 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B-Preview (2024-11-28).

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

2 mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

QwQ-32B-Preview

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2024 score (92.0% vs 50.0%)
Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 65.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwQ-32B-Preview
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.
QwQ-32B-Preview is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google. QwQ-32B-Preview costs $0.15/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.