Gemini 3 Flash vs MiniMax M2.1 Comparison

Comparing Gemini 3 Flash and MiniMax M2.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified, Toolathlon), while MiniMax M2.1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than MiniMax M2.1 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than MiniMax M2.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. MiniMax M2.1 can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2.1 does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M2.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M2.1 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M2.1

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while MiniMax M2.1 was released on 2025-12-23.

MiniMax M2.1 is 0 month newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

2 months ago

MiniMax M2.1

Dec 23, 2025

2 months ago

6d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiniMax M2.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M2.1's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

MiniMax M2.1

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. MiniMax M2.1 is available from MiniMax. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

MiniMax M2.1

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 81.0%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 81.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 22.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 67.0%)
Higher Toolathlon score (49.4% vs 43.5%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1