Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Toolathlon), while MiniMax M2.7 is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.7
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2.7 does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M2.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M2.7 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M2.7

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while MiniMax M2.7 was released on 2026-03-18.

MiniMax M2.7 is 3 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

3 months ago

MiniMax M2.7

Mar 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiniMax M2.7's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M2.7's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

MiniMax M2.7

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Toolathlon score (49.4% vs 46.3%)
MiniMax
Has open weights
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (57.0% vs 47.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.7

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and MiniMax M2.7 is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. MiniMax M2.7 scores SWE-bench Multilingual: 76.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 66.6%, MM-ClawBench: 62.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 57.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 56.2%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and MiniMax M2.7 is developed by MiniMax.