Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 3.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemini 3 Flash is 15 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

4 months ago

1.2yr newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 36.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output via together.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.