Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking — which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 3 Flash is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input tokens$0.45
Output tokens$3.49
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3 Flash is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.45/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.49/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.98/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.95/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 89.7%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (80.3% vs 66.1%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 13.6%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.2% vs 69.3%)
Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (69.1% vs 61.8%)
Higher SimpleQA score (68.7% vs 44.4%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (86.9% vs 80.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Less expensive input tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.45/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons