Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 2.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 3 Flash

Input tokens$0.50

Output tokens$3.00

Best providerGoogle

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input tokens$0.20

Output tokens$0.99

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's 131,072 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Gemini 3 Flash

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input131,072 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3 Flash is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

2mo newer

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Gemini 3 Flash

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Flash

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)

Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 83.1%)

Higher CharXiv-R score (80.3% vs 56.6%)

Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 74.4%)

Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.2% vs 63.0%)

Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (69.1% vs 57.3%)

Higher SimpleQA score (68.7% vs 23.9%)

Higher VideoMMMU score (86.9% vs 75.0%)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 3 Flash	Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.