Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Comparison

Comparing Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

12 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 8 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, Global PIQA, GPQA, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 4 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, OmniDocBench 1.5, ScreenSpot Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Gemini 3 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 2 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

3 months ago

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 24, 2026

3 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available from Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher CharXiv-R score (80.3% vs 77.2%)
Higher Global PIQA score (92.8% vs 88.4%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 86.6%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.8% vs 86.7%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.2% vs 76.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 72.0%)
Higher t2-bench score (90.2% vs 79.5%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (86.9% vs 82.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Has open weights
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (47.5% vs 43.5%)
Higher OmniDocBench 1.5 score (89.8% vs 12.1%)
Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (70.4% vs 69.1%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (49.4% vs 47.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B