Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison
Comparing Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3.5-27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 9 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, Global PIQA, GPQA, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, Terminal-Bench 2.0, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3.5-27B is better at 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, OmniDocBench 1.5, ScreenSpot Pro).
Gemini 3 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemini 3 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3.5-27B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Flash
Qwen3.5-27B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-27B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Qwen3.5-27B was released on 2026-02-24.
Qwen3.5-27B is 2 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.
Dec 17, 2025
3 months ago
Feb 24, 2026
3 weeks ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.5-27B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-27B's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5-27B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|