Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen2.5 72B InstructWhich is better in 2026?
Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 12.4x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct — which is better?
Gemini 3 Pro (by Google) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is roughly 12.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3 Pro if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…
- cost matters — it's about 12.4x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 5.7x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Pro is more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Gemini 3 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemini 3 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.
Gemini 3 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 3 Pro
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Qwen
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.
Gemini 3 Pro is 14 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Nov 18, 2025
6 months ago
1.2yr newerSep 19, 2024
1.7 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.
Gemini 3 Pro
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3 Pro
View details
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.