Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 6.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 11.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 5.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($2.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Pro is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 3 Pro

Input tokens$2.00

Output tokens$12.00

Best providerGoogle

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Input tokens$0.18

Output tokens$2.09

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Gemini 3 Pro

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3 Pro is 2 months newer than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Gemini 3 Pro

Nov 18, 2025

5 months ago

1mo newer

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3 Pro

Google

Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.09/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Pro

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 80.3%)

Higher CharXiv-R score (81.4% vs 53.0%)

Higher GPQA score (91.9% vs 69.9%)

Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.0% vs 60.4%)

Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (72.7% vs 46.6%)

Higher SimpleQA score (72.1% vs 49.6%)

Higher VideoMMMU score (87.6% vs 72.8%)

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 3 Pro	Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Pro compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Global PIQA: 93.4%, GPQA: 91.9%, MMMLU: 91.8%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

Is Gemini 3 Pro cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 11.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via google. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs $0.18/M input and $2.09/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.18/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Gemini 3 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.