Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison
Comparing Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.5-27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 10 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, Global PIQA, GPQA, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, Terminal-Bench 2.0, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3.5-27B is better at 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, OmniDocBench 1.5).
Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.5-27B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Pro
Qwen3.5-27B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-27B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while Qwen3.5-27B was released on 2026-02-24.
Qwen3.5-27B is 3 months newer than Gemini 3 Pro.
Nov 18, 2025
3 months ago
Feb 24, 2026
3 weeks ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.5-27B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-27B's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3 Pro
View details
Qwen3.5-27B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|