Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image vs GPT Image 2Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and GPT Image 2 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image vs GPT Image 2 — which is better?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (by Google) and GPT Image 2 (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Image if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token

Choose GPT Image 2 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per generated image

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image costs less

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image ($0.50/image) is 10.0x cheaper than GPT Image 2 ($5.00/image).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image
Per image$0.50
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT Image 2
Per image$5.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT Image 2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image was released on 2026-02-26, while GPT Image 2 was released on 2026-04-21.

GPT Image 2 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Flash Image.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

Feb 26, 2026

3 months ago

GPT Image 2

Apr 21, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is available from Google. GPT Image 2 is available from OpenAI.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

GPT Image 2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (65,536 tokens)
Less expensive per image
OpenAI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image
OpenAI
GPT Image 2

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Flash Image vs GPT Image 2.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image or GPT Image 2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Google) and GPT Image 2 (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Image cheaper than GPT Image 2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image costs $0.50/M input and $30.00/M output via google. GPT Image 2 costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and GPT Image 2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image supports 66K tokens and GPT Image 2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and GPT Image 2?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.50 vs $5.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and GPT Image 2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is developed by Google and GPT Image 2 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons