Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Comparison

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite outperforms in 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MMMU-Pro, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleQA).

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($1.50/1M tokens) is 1.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($1.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.49
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 5 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Mar 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.49/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Higher CharXiv-R score (73.2% vs 62.1%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (76.8% vs 68.1%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (84.8% vs 74.7%)
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher SimpleQA score (51.9% vs 43.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct