Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct Comparison

Comparing Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite outperforms in 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MMMU-Pro, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleQA).

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($1.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 5 months newer than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Mar 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is available from DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher CharXiv-R score (73.2% vs 39.7%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (76.8% vs 53.2%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (84.8% vs 56.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher SimpleQA score (48.0% vs 43.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct