Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.7 Comparison

Comparing Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM-4.7 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 5 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while GLM-4.7 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7 costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than GLM-4.7 ($0.60/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($15.00/1M tokens) is 6.8x more expensive than GLM-4.7 ($2.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.1 Pro is more expensive than GLM-4.7.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerGoogle
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.20
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.1 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7's 202,800 tokens. GLM-4.7 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
Input202,800 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM-4.7 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.7 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.7

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while GLM-4.7 was released on 2025-12-22.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 2 months newer than GLM-4.7.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

3 weeks ago

1mo newer
GLM-4.7

Dec 22, 2025

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GLM-4.7's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-4.7's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

GLM-4.7

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.1 Pro is available from Google. GLM-4.7 is available from Fireworks, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GLM-4.7

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher BrowseComp score (85.9% vs 52.0%)
Higher GPQA score (94.3% vs 85.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (51.4% vs 42.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.6% vs 73.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (68.5% vs 41.0%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7