Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MAI-Code-1-Flash

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 5 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Code-1-Flash does not.

Gemini 3.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while MAI-Code-1-Flash was released on 2026-06-02.

MAI-Code-1-Flash is 3 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

3 months ago

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Jun 2, 2026

4 days ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MAI-Code-1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MAI-Code-1-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

MAI-Code-1-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (94.3% vs 84.6%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (51.4% vs 18.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (54.2% vs 51.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.6% vs 71.6%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (68.5% vs 54.8%)
Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and MAI-Code-1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to MAI-Code-1-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. MAI-Code-1-Flash scores AIME 2026: 92.5%, GPQA: 84.6%, IFBench: 75.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 71.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 71.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and MAI-Code-1-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and MAI-Code-1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.