Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct Comparison
Comparing Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is 8 months newer than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.
Feb 19, 2026
3 weeks ago
8mo newerJun 20, 2025
8 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.
Gemini 3.1 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).
Jan 2025
1.3 yr newerOct 2023
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|