Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Phi 4 Mini

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerGoogle
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

Gemini 3.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 13 months newer than Phi 4 Mini.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

1 months ago

1.0yr newer
Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Phi 4 Mini has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 3.1 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Phi 4 Mini (2024-06-01).

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

7 mo newer
Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (94.3% vs 25.2%)
Microsoft
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Phi 4 Mini

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Mini supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.