Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct Comparison
Comparing Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
tongyi-qianwen
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is 13 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.
Feb 19, 2026
3 weeks ago
1.1yr newerJan 26, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|