The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-4B

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 19.4.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 19.4, ranking #40 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.4 and ranks #40 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3.5-4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
Qwen3.5-4B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.4
#40
19.4
#195
Reasoning
45.1
#28
19.8
#187
Agents
24.0
#50
4.0
#150
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen3.5-4B
Math
42.1#5
19.9#154
Tool use
23.4#40
6.1#141
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Gemini 3.1 Pro · 25 for Qwen3.5-4B

3 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, t2-bench), while Qwen3.5-4B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-4B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Qwen3.5-4B was released on 2026-03-02.

Qwen3.5-4B is 0 month newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

6 months ago

Qwen3.5-4B

Mar 2, 2026

6 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.5-4B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-4B's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen3.5-4B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-4B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3.5-4B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 19.4. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3.5-4B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Qwen3.5-4B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Qwen3.5-4B scores IFEval: 89.8%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, C-Eval: 85.1%, t2-bench: 79.9%, MMLU-Pro: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-4B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.5-4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-4B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.4 vs 19.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.5-4B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3.5-4B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons