Make AI phone calls with one API call

Start for free

Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-27B

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 6 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.6-27B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

Start for freeRead the docs
$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.6-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.6-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.6-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.6-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Qwen3.6-27B was released on 2026-04-21.

Qwen3.6-27B is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

2 months ago

Qwen3.6-27B

Apr 21, 2026

2 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.6-27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.6-27B's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen3.6-27B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (94.3% vs 87.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (51.4% vs 24.0%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (80.5% vs 75.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (54.2% vs 53.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.6% vs 77.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (68.5% vs 59.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6-27B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-27B

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3.6-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Qwen3.6-27B scores CountBench: 97.8%, VLMsAreBlind: 97.0%, V*: 94.7%, AIME 2026: 94.1%, HMMT 2025: 93.8%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.6-27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3.6-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.