Model Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 7 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B was released on 2026-04-16.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Feb 19, 2026
1 months ago
Apr 16, 2026
2 days ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B