Model Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Gemini 3.1 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 6 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.6 Plus is better at 2 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, SWE-Bench Pro).

Gemini 3.1 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6 Plus
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6 Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.6 Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.6 Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Qwen3.6 Plus was released on 2026-03-31.

Qwen3.6 Plus is 1 month newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.6 Plus

Mar 31, 2026

2 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.6 Plus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.6 Plus's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen3.6 Plus

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (94.3% vs 90.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (51.4% vs 28.8%)
Higher MMMLU score (92.6% vs 89.5%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (80.5% vs 78.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.6% vs 78.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (68.5% vs 61.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6 Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher MCP Atlas score (74.1% vs 69.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (56.6% vs 54.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6 Plus

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Gemini 3.1 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3.6 Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Qwen3.6 Plus scores CountBench: 97.6%, V*: 96.9%, HMMT 2025: 96.7%, AIME 2026: 95.3%, HMMT25: 94.6%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.6 Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3.6 Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.