Model Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 — which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (by Google) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (by NVIDIA) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is 16 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

NVIDIA
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (Google) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (NVIDIA) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons