Model Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok-2 Image 1212Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok-2 Image 1212 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok-2 Image 1212 — which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (by Google) and Grok-2 Image 1212 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Grok-2 Image 1212 if…

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok-2 Image 1212don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok-2 Image 1212's 131,072 tokens. Only Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
xAI
Grok-2 Image 1212
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-2 Image 1212 does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-2 Image 1212

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-2 Image 1212

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Grok-2 Image 1212 was released on 2024-12-12.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 20 months newer than Grok-2 Image 1212.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

4 days ago

1.6yr newer
Grok-2 Image 1212

Dec 12, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Grok-2 Image 1212's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-2 Image 1212's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

Grok-2 Image 1212

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Grok-2 Image 1212 is available from xAI.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Grok-2 Image 1212

xai logo
xAI
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
xAI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok-2 Image 1212 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Grok-2 Image 1212
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
xAI
Grok-2 Image 1212

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok-2 Image 1212.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Grok-2 Image 1212?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google) and Grok-2 Image 1212 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Grok-2 Image 1212 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-2 Image 1212 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok-2 Image 1212?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Grok-2 Image 1212 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons