Model Comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-4o miniWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o mini across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-4o mini — which is better?

Gemini 3.6 Flash (by Google) and GPT-4o mini (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, GPT-4o mini is roughly 11.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.6 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose GPT-4o mini if…

  • cost matters — it's about 11.4x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o mini costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.6 Flash ($1.50/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.6 Flash ($7.50/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.6 Flash is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jul 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input tokens$1.50
Output tokens$7.50
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Thu Jul 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.6 Flash was released on 2026-07-21, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.

Gemini 3.6 Flash is 24 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Jul 21, 2026

1 days ago

2.0yr newer
GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while GPT-4o mini has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemini 3.6 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4o mini (2023-10-01).

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Mar 2026

2.4 yr newer
GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.6 Flash is available from Google. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.6 Flash
✓ Preferred
GPT-4o mini
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-4o mini.

Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-4o mini?

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) and GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.6 Flash compare to GPT-4o mini in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 89.4%, OSWorld-Verified: 83.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 78.0%, MLE-Bench: 63.9%, SWE-Bench Pro: 58.7%. GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%.

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash cheaper than GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via google. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o mini?

Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o mini?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($1.50 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-4o mini?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is developed by Google and GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons