The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi-k1.5

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you are already invested in the Moonshot AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
Released
Aug 2026
Jan 2025
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 19 months newer than Kimi-k1.5.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Kimi-k1.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi-k1.5's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

Kimi-k1.5

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Kimi-k1.5?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and Kimi-k1.5 (Moonshot AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and Kimi-k1.5?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.