The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, MiMo-V2-Omni is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Omni

  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
MiMo-V2-Omni
Xiaomi
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.40 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$2.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,000
Released
Aug 2026
Mar 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omnidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Omni costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Omni's 262,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 5 months newer than MiMo-V2-Omni.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer
MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2-Omni's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Omni's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2-Omni

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

MiMo-V2-Omni

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Omni
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and MiMo-V2-Omni (Xiaomi) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to MiMo-V2-Omni in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.40/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons