The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 36.3.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 36.3, ranking #18 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.7 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.3 and ranks #18 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
49.3
#18
36.3
#74
Reasoning
47.1
#23
35.4
#76
Coding
35.6
#24
21.3
#84
Agents
33.2
#21
11.7
#98
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Tool use
26.6#25
3.7#154
Long context
30.8#3
23.2#19
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemini 3.7 Flash · 26 for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

1 shared

Gemini 3.7 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) does not.

Gemini 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) was released on 2026-06-04.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 2 months newer than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

3 weeks ago

2mo newer
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Jun 4, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a cutoff of 2025-09-30.

Gemini 3.7 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) (2025-09-30).

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

6 mo newer
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Sep 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 36.3. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) scores RULER: 94.7%, IMO-AnswerBench: 92.3%, PinchBench: 90.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 89.0%, GPQA: 87.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.3 vs 36.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons