The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Seed 2.0 Lite

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Seed 2.0 Lite

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—
Released
Aug 2026
Feb 2026
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Litedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.7 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Lite
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.0 Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Seed 2.0 Lite was released on 2026-02-14.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 6 months newer than Seed 2.0 Lite.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

2 weeks ago

6mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Feb 14, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Seed 2.0 Lite has a cutoff of 2024-01-01.

Gemini 3.7 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Seed 2.0 Lite (2024-01-01).

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

2.2 yr newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Lite
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Seed 2.0 Lite.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and Seed 2.0 Lite (ByteDance) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to Seed 2.0 Lite in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. Seed 2.0 Lite scores AIME 2025: 93.0%, AIME 2026: 88.3%, GPQA: 85.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Seed 2.0 Lite supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and Seed 2.0 Lite is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons