Model Comparison

Gemini Diffusion vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini Diffusion outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 4 Maverick is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MBPP).

Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini Diffusion
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input tokens$0.17
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Maverick specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini Diffusion
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini Diffusion does not.

Llama 4 Maverick can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini Diffusion

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Maverick

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini Diffusion is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini Diffusion

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini Diffusion was released on 2025-05-20, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.

Gemini Diffusion is 2 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.

Gemini Diffusion

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

1mo newer
Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Meta
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (69.8% vs 40.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (43.4% vs 30.9%)
Higher MBPP score (77.6% vs 76.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini Diffusion
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini Diffusion vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini Diffusion is made by Google and Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini Diffusion scores HumanEval: 89.6%, MBPP: 76.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 69.1%, LBPP (v2): 56.8%, BigCodeBench: 45.4%. Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%.
Gemini Diffusion supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini Diffusion is developed by Google and Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta.