Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH).

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Mon May 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Claude 3.5 Haiku uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 4 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.9 years ago

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher HumanEval score (88.1% vs 51.8%)
Higher MATH score (69.4% vs 42.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Claude 3.5 Haiku in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 27B and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.