Gemma 2 27B vs Grok-1.5 Comparison

Comparing Gemma 2 27B and Grok-1.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-1.5 is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
xAI
Grok-1.5
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Grok-1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28.

Gemma 2 27B is 3 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.7 years ago

3mo newer
Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Has open weights
Higher GSM8k score (90.0% vs 74.0%)
Higher HumanEval score (74.1% vs 51.8%)
Higher MATH score (50.6% vs 42.3%)
Higher MMLU score (81.3% vs 75.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
xAI
Grok-1.5