Model Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (ARC-C, HumanEval).

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.03
Best providerLambda
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

19.2B diff

Gemma 2 27B has 19.2B more parameters than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, making it 240.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B
8.0B
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 1 month newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.7 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 27B

—

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Higher MMLU score (75.2% vs 69.4%)
Meta
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (83.4% vs 71.4%)
Higher HumanEval score (72.6% vs 51.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 27B
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores GSM-8K (CoT): 84.5%, ARC-C: 83.4%, API-Bank: 82.6%, IFEval: 80.4%, BFCL: 76.1%.
Gemma 2 27B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is developed by Meta.