Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comparing Gemma 2 27B by Google and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct by Meta across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 42.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 27B, making it 157.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct was released on 2024-12-06.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 5 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.
Jun 27, 2024
1.7 years ago
Dec 6, 2024
1.3 years ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 2 27B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|