The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 27B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Gemma 2 27B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched at -0.7 and 1.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 2 27B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.7 and 1.9.

In the 11 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 27B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 11 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 2 27B
Google
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.7
#329
1.9
#317
Reasoning
-1.1
#325
1.4
#310
Coding
-7.9
#262
-3.8
#253
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 11
8 of 11
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 2 27B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Math
-0.7#297
4.3#284
Legal
1.9#172
4.3#165
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemma 2 27B · 31 for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

11 shared

Gemma 2 27B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BoolQ, HellaSwag, Winogrande), while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is better at 8 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP, MMLU, PIQA, Social IQa).

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

32.8B diff

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has 32.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 27B, making it 120.6% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 27B is licensed under Gemma, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is 2 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 27B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 27B
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 27B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 2 27B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.7 and 1.9. Gemma 2 27B is made by Google and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 2 27B compare to Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 27B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.7 vs 1.9), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons