Model Comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3 27B is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP).
Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 3 27B has 17.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 192.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.
Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 3 27B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Gemma.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Gemma
Open weights
Gemma
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.
Gemma 3 27B is 9 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.
Jun 27, 2024
1.9 years ago
Mar 12, 2025
1.2 years ago
8mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 2 9B
View detailsNo standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Gemma 3 27B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 3 27B.