The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 2 9B vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval). Granite 3.3 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
128,000
Released
Jun 2024
Apr 2025
License
Gemma
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval).

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.2B diff

Gemma 2 9B has 1.2B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 15.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Granite 3.3 8B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 10 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Gemma 2 9B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 2 9B's cutoff date.

Gemma 2 9B

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 9B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 9B
✓ Preferred
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 9B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM.