Gemma 2 9B vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct Comparison
Comparing Gemma 2 9B and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 5 benchmarks (BoolQ, HellaSwag, MMLU, PIQA, Winogrande), while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP, Social IQa).
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Gemma 2 9B has 5.4B more parameters than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct, making it 143.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is 2 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.
Jun 27, 2024
1.7 years ago
Aug 23, 2024
1.6 years ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemma 2 9B
View detailsPhi-3.5-mini-instruct
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|