The AI arena is free today

Open Playground

Model Comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5 72B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 2 9B (by Google) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP). Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 2 9B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP).

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

63.5B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 63.5B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 686.8% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Fri Aug 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 3 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher GSM8k score (95.8% vs 68.6%)
Higher HumanEval score (86.6% vs 40.2%)
Higher MATH score (83.1% vs 36.6%)
Higher MBPP score (88.2% vs 52.4%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 2 9B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.