Model Comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag, MMLU, Winogrande), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemma 2 9B

Input tokens$0.00

Output tokens$0.00

Best providerUnknown Organization

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Input tokens$0.00

Output tokens$0.00

Best providerUnknown Organization

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.2B diff

Gemma 2 9B has 2.2B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 32.0% larger.

Gemma 2 9B

9.2Bparameters

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

7.0Bparameters

9.2B

Gemma 2 9B

7.0B

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is 3 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B

View details

Google

Higher ARC-C score (68.4% vs 60.9%)

Higher HellaSwag score (81.9% vs 76.8%)

Higher MMLU score (71.3% vs 67.6%)

Higher Winogrande score (80.6% vs 72.9%)

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GSM8k score (83.9% vs 68.6%)

Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 40.2%)

Higher MATH score (46.6% vs 36.6%)

Higher MBPP score (83.5% vs 52.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemma 2 9B	Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Performance Benchmarks

Arena Performance

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Outputs Comparison

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?