Model Comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B — which is better?

Gemma 2 9B (by Google) and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP). Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 2 9B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP).

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.2B diff

Gemma 2 9B has 2.2B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 32.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 2 9B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 9 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.2 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GSM8k score (88.7% vs 68.6%)
Higher HumanEval score (78.7% vs 40.2%)
Higher MATH score (71.5% vs 36.6%)
Higher MBPP score (73.2% vs 52.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Gemma 2 9B or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 2 9B is made by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 2 9B compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 2 9B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.