The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 12B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 5.8. Gemma 3 12B is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 5.8, ranking #5 overall.

On price, Gemma 3 12B is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 12B

  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.4 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.8
#283
55.4
#5
6.2
#276
53.0
#6
2.9
#213
41.6
#9
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.05 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.10 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
131,072
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 12B · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 12B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 12B ($0.05/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 12B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.3 is more expensive than Gemma 3 12B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131,072 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while Gemma 3 12B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Muse Spark 1.3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 12B.

Gemma 3 12B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 12B is available from DeepInfra. Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API.

Gemma 3 12B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 12B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, Gemma 3 12B or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 5.8. Gemma 3 12B is made by Google and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 12B compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 12B scores GSM8k: 94.4%, IFEval: 88.9%, DocVQA: 87.1%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.7%, HumanEval: 85.4%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

Is Gemma 3 12B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

Gemma 3 12B is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 12B costs $0.05/M input and $0.10/M output via deepinfra. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.3?

Gemma 3 12B supports 131K tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.8 vs 55.4), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.05 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.3?

Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.