Model Comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3 12B (by Google) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista-Mini). Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 12B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3 12B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista-Mini).

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

60.0B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 60.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 12B, making it 500.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 12B
12.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
12.0B
Gemma 3 12B
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 12B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 12B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 12B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 12B is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Gemma 3 12B is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Gemma 3 12B

Mar 12, 2025

1.4 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AI2D score (88.4% vs 84.2%)
Higher ChartQA score (89.5% vs 75.7%)
Higher DocVQA score (96.4% vs 87.1%)
Higher MathVista-Mini score (74.8% vs 62.9%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 12B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 12B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3 12B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 12B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 12B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 12B scores GSM8k: 94.4%, IFEval: 88.9%, DocVQA: 87.1%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.7%, HumanEval: 85.4%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.