Model Comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewWhich is better in 2026?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 1B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview — which is better?

Gemma 3 1B (by Google) and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview (by IBM) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 3 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GSM8k, HumanEval). IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 1B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3 1B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 3 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GSM8k, HumanEval).

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has 6.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 600.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 1B.

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.4 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.2 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher IFEval score (80.2% vs 63.0%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (55.7% vs 39.1%)
Higher GSM8k score (70.1% vs 62.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (82.4% vs 41.5%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 1B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 1B
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3 1B or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 1B is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 1B compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 1B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 1B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.