Gemma 3 1B vs Mistral Small
Comparing Gemma 3 1B and Mistral Small across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemma 3 1B and Mistral Small trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemma 3 1B
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
Choose Mistral Small
- you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $0.60/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemma 3 1B and Mistral Smalldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Mistral Small has 21.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 2100.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Mistral Small specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only Mistral Small specifies output context (32,768 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemma 3 1B is licensed under Gemma, while Mistral Small uses Mistral Research License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Gemma
Open weights
Mistral Research License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12, while Mistral Small was released on 2024-09-17.
Gemma 3 1B is 6 months newer than Mistral Small.
Mar 12, 2025
1.5 years ago
5mo newerSep 17, 2024
1.9 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 1B and Mistral Small side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemma 3 1B vs Mistral Small.