Model Comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewWhich is better in 2026?

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview — which is better?

Gemma 3 27B (by Google) and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 10 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, ECLeKTic, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, HiddenMath, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, WMT24++), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 10 of 10 shared benchmarks

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

10 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 10 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, ECLeKTic, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, HiddenMath, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, WMT24++), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.1B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 25.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 1313.6% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Gemma.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.4 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 27B

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (87.6% vs 52.9%)
Higher ECLeKTic score (16.7% vs 1.9%)
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (75.1% vs 64.5%)
Higher GPQA score (42.4% vs 23.7%)
Higher HiddenMath score (60.3% vs 37.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (87.8% vs 75.0%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (29.7% vs 13.2%)
Higher MBPP score (74.4% vs 63.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (67.5% vs 50.6%)
Higher WMT24++ score (53.4% vs 50.1%)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 27B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Related comparisons