Model Comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs o1-pro

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemma 3 27B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-pro is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
o1-pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 27B is licensed under Gemma, while o1-pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

Gemma 3 27B is 3 months newer than o1-pro.

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 27B

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (79.0% vs 42.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 27B
OpenAI
o1-pro

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 27B vs o1-pro.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or o1-pro?

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is made by Google and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 27B compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro?

Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens and o1-pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.