Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs GPT OSS 120B High

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is 8.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B High is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than GPT OSS 120B High ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than GPT OSS 120B High ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT OSS 120B High is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu May 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

112.8B diff

GPT OSS 120B High has 112.8B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 2820.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
116.8Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B High

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu May 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B High does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT OSS 120B High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while GPT OSS 120B High uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

GPT OSS 120B High

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT OSS 120B High is 5 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

GPT OSS 120B High

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while GPT OSS 120B High's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 120B High's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

GPT OSS 120B High

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra. GPT OSS 120B High is available from OpenAI, Fireworks.

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M

GPT OSS 120B High

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
OpenAI
Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 30.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.7% vs 43.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs GPT OSS 120B High.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or GPT OSS 120B High?

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and GPT OSS 120B High is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to GPT OSS 120B High in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. GPT OSS 120B High scores AIME 2025: 92.5%, MMMLU: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.9%, GPQA: 80.9%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%.

Is Gemma 3 4B cheaper than GPT OSS 120B High?

Gemma 3 4B is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra. GPT OSS 120B High costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and GPT OSS 120B High?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and GPT OSS 120B High supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and GPT OSS 120B High?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.02 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and GPT OSS 120B High?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and GPT OSS 120B High is developed by OpenAI.